rapidblue wrote:
Dan stick with the K !
If we all did what everyone else said it would be boring! I think what you are doing is great
- and if you hang with Pel's Crew at the pod your bound to get more ideas!
As for swapping motors Ive been told loads of times on various forums (including here) to swap my motor - ATM I am sticking with my 1.3 Skoda engine (Cold war Czech behind the back seat) I am not considering anything else although it has been suggested.
Anyway back to the F
Looking at the Zorst, I reckon go for a single unit. Adding 2 doubles hassle, parts and needs more space. Joining the inlet again to go into the manifold could lead to problems as it could lead to one turbo spooling and possibly stopping the other with blowback? (dunno on this but just looking at the plumbing gives me this theory) Or you need to split the intake manifold, then 2 TB's for 2 turbos and all sorts of hassle with that.
Maybe a t2 from a Saab 900/9000? There are loads in the scrap yards and they do provide decent boost with only a small amount of lag. Also most of the bits you will need are available.
Does your K have a metal Throttle body? You would be better with metal as it will take the heat easier just block off the breathers to it by connecting a piece of pipe from one to the other. (and metal dont melt if you backfire
speaking from experience - I use a K body on my Skoda as I dont use petrol)
The reason I say a t2 is that the 2.0 saab has a t2 and all the 2.0 and below conversions that I have seen that worked well were all t2. The metro had a t3 on it but they are hard to find and therefore expensive. Also if its cheap then you can always change it later for a bigger turbo:yes:
Also a turbo quietens down the engine loads so you wont need so much exhaust to kill sound....... Giving some more room.
Building the engine to take it then adding a turbo could be a good move - depends on how long it will take. Most of the turbo in the tail conversions I have seen didnt need much in the way of rebuilds as they were all relatively low boost (below 10 psi)
Put the intake on one side and the exhaust on tother - left side 'exhaust' sucks, right side blows
(less piping)
At the PPC Challenge we saw a rover 200 with a turbo conversion. It worked but didnt seem that good - his times were not much better than standard. He had a HOOGE turbo and very industrial piping (well they were tractor mechanics) I am not sure how they overcame fueling etc but I think they remapped.
What are you looking to do about fueling? Are you going to an aftermarket ecu or just bigger injectors and higher fuel pressure?
ANd probably the other questions I should ask is HOW much you want?
Do you want big boost with the engine revving up to its 7000 or so limit?
Or would you settle for lower revs having more power on tap?
Wow, thanks. I didn't expect a reply that detailed
Where to start
I can see your point about joining the inlet again, hadn't really thought that one through too much. The current throttle body is the bigger 52mm alloy one so that should be ok
Individual throttle bodies perhaps with each inlet running to two throttle bodies? Might be a bit tight on space and i'd imagine I'd actually have to cut into the boot space but that wouldn't be the end of the world
The Saab option sounds like a good one, not a lot on eBay but I could be searching for the wrong thing. This is what I had come up -
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Saab-900-GM-9-3-A ... 588b0a0513 I am more than happy to go scrapyard searching though, no better way to spend a Saturday morning
I am toying with the idea of perhaps fitting one turbo to the car now and running low boost to keep the power just shy of 200bhp, that's roughly what I'm running with the nitrous now and it seems reliable enough (famous last words
) Just to get it up and running and see how it feels with the turbo and make sure it can work.
Fueling I am planning to go with swapping the ECU for, most likely, an Emerald as it can control the VVC mechs as well as do pretty much anything else I could ask of it. Not cheap but then neither is another engine when the fueling messes up and it goes bang
As for how much do I want.....
Not fussed about big top end power numbers, I would ideally want more power on tap throughout the rev range without it falling off at the top but the lower end is what i'm after
billb wrote:
Unless Saab have changed their turbo's around a lot, Saab 900 turbo's are T3's which would work really well actually! Me & a mate built up a turbo setup on his 1.6 vtec CRX using a Saab 900 T3 it spooled really well but ran out of poof at 7500ish RPM so would suit your Rover engine I'd say. We ran 7psi of boost with a remapped ECU & larger injectors mapped by me to be very safe & it was a hoot
Bill
Thanks, that sounds like just the thing
What were the power/torque figures before and after? Anywhere around a 40-50bhp increase would be about right until any engine work is done
If I didn't have a wedding to go to this weekend then I know where I'd be spending it