My concerns about the meth injection lies with the atomization difference from one fluid to an other. I know that Meth and fuel come out of the nozzle in a fog state and my meth injection nozzle atomizes to a lower performance compared to the fog coming from the nos nozzle.
That's not going to be a problem.Wouldn't there by a type of fluid mix that would cause some cylinders to run more Nitrous than others? Let's say that I'm afraid that the 2 fluids wont combine effectively causing erratic A/F differences between the two banks of cylinders.
There is always a risk of uneven distribution from single injector/s feeding multiple cylinders but by locating them as far from the inlet valves as possible, there is more time for the various media's to mix evenly before splitting in to individual runners but this is unrelated to any difference in the type of media being injected. This is my main concern.
I wouldn't worry about any of that, as we've had (and probably still got) PLENTY of similar arrangements working perfectly well.Also I was seeing the that minimax controller allows for progressive injection of Nitrous to the engine. Could I rig the Minimax to a stand alone ems so that when the ems sends the signal to activate the solenoids, the minimax will commence its operations? My Aem ems can control standard Nitrous solenoids with Rpm, tps, load, Vehicle speed sensor windows and I was thinking that using the ems windows and the minimax progressive control would yield me a nice street setup. Also I have Exhaust temperature monitors, if EGT get to high I can use a relay activated by the ems to shut down the nitrous system. What do you think / suggest?
Yes that would all work but you'd be better off with a Max Extreme as it offers MANY more features, including some very beneficial safety features. 
