NITROUS OXIDE ( nos / n2o ) advice forum

Just a lil' 5.7 V8 Fbody

IS that in the form of some american muscle then??

^^^ yep, looks like a Camaro, by the looks of his sig

but c'mon guys, let's not thread hi-jack now...

My thoughts on the whole debate is the following...

For me, Nitrous cannot be regarded as a serious form of tuning as it isn't designed for any particular make or model but for the internal combustion engine itself. I can only see the uses of nitrous as more of an add-on fun thing which one does in addition to conventional tuning... I mean how many racing teams use nitrous as part of their car prep?

When one starts to tune the car in n/a form, there are a number of advantages, the main being that the power is always there... If you're running a absurdly high shot of nos (e.g. 3 - 400), how long will that last? At most possibly a minute? What use is that if you want to use it on a track? There are also benefits to n/a tuning... one does really get a real personal satisfaction knowing that you've extracted more power without cheating (i.e. FI), and it can change the character of the car also without it being schizophrenic (as it is with nos )

Ofcourse there are cases in which nitrous is a very good option... For example some n/a engines are relatively untunable, e.g. my VQ35DE engine... ->Without spending ludicrous amounts of money. It is like drawing blood from a stone I tell you. Other cars I wouldn't think to take nitrous anywhere near.. e.g. the FQ400 (400bhp from a 2.0 engine!!), or a p1 for example which has a short lifespan as it is.

I think nitrous has to be considered on a case by case basis. With the growing number of inherently weaker engines coming to market (my VQ35DE included), the use of large shots of nitrous will be an even bigger concern.

Awaits flame...

oh dear...

Is that not true of pretty much anything. A cam is just a metal shaft with pre-designed lobes. The same lobes will then be used on cams for other engines, just the shaft and sprocket will be different.

Is a k&n induction kit really purposely made for only one vehicle, or do they use the same filter and associated components for a 100 different models?


I think it depends highly on the nature of the motor sport the race team competes. these all use nitrous as part of the car prep:









I agree n/a tuning should not be forgotten, although depending on engine and application it carries different merits. Take the Ls1 in my car, it's fairly easy to chuck some bolt on's at it with a sensible cam and some budget heads and take it from ~350hp to 450hp and retain streetability and mpg. Other engines like the Jaguar V12 cost far too many ££££ for the somewhat limited gains so n/a tuning is largely a waste.


I can't understand this view that using a power adder is cheating....

Does that mean that anyone n/a tuning a DOHC over a OHV is also cheating because of greater breathing ability offered by multivalve setups?


I can't really see any reason why nitrous would not be a viable option unless limited by some sort of motor sports regulatory body.

I guess the only reason would be if you had a vehicle already deemed quick enough for its use. Example a built and ProCharged LS1, even at 346ci can still produce an everyday 700rwhp. For a street car thats probably enough, although nitrous would only enhance it further.


Nitrous will still do it's job = make more power. The fact that these engines in this trim may not be strong eough built is not a fault of nitrous. BTW - there are guys in the US running Evo's at 2.3 litres and over 600whp.


Yep so do I

If you want to go fast - reach for the nitrous


Weaker engines?

Lets see a 2.0 DOHC Ford 4 pot nowadays will happily make 240bhp n/a. Try attaining that from one of the old cross flow units. Add nitrous and the old motor stands no chance.

I think new engines are taking the older ones by storm:

-Chevy LSx series of engines
-Ford mod V8's
-Dodge Hemi's
-Dodge V10
-Cummins 5.9
-most of the modern 4 pots
-all Common Rail diesels
-Jaguar V8

ive just bought a mondeo with a ford zetec-e 18i 16v engine
in standard trim it makes 115bhp, with £1000 it can have weber alpha throttle bodies and ecu fitted this takes it to 150bhp
now for the 1970s pinto at 2.0litres you have 90bhp and it needed cams, exhaust, twin webers, ignition mods to get near 150bhp
with all that extra stuff on the zetec you get near 200bhp
the engine has forged pistons to start with and only need steel rods to rev to 8500rpms
like said, 240bhp isnt impossible out of a zetec
try getting that out of a pinto or even a BDA!

i still love my old essex v6 with its crappy 140bhp stock power, but 190lbs tq is where its at
any engine that can pull 1200kg along at idle in 4th gear is sweet by me
was tempted by the cosworth v6 though
end of the day, theres no replacement for displacement

wow ^^^

i never knew the zetec motor had so much potential!!

might have to do some googling on it!

How did I miss that post by Sab, thankfully it was dealt with very well without my input.

...I've got to admit, I was a bit surprised by your absense from the thread after he posted!!

Thankfully 300bhp/ton did an excellent job of making sabs opinion look at best ill informed and at worst plain stupid, so its good to see my input was not needed.

Im mainly into fast road cars, where due to the amount of time you spend at WOT in a week potentially, relying on nitrous alone would prove expensive, so I tend to go for a bit of conventional tuning thats enough to get me up and down a country lane quickly or whatever, and then nitrous for putting me into my seat on a dual carriageway.

So to me its about using both together, not one or the other.

For the drag strip though, or any other short WOT application, nitrous wins hands down!

Guess this guy never got round to riding a race tuned 250LC then eh?? Makes my nitrous burning drag bike feel placid in comparison!!

Oddly enough, all the negativety surrounding nitrous, harmfull to engines, uncontrollable, seems to frequently come from ppl who not only think its good to use crap gear but also seem to think its ok to add 100hp to their engine and not appreciate the need to have a sorted chassis and suspension to cope!!
Any form of tuning, no matter whether nitrous, turbo or n/a is only a part of the overall package. All road going vehicles are a compromise between comfort and performance to some extent, so even a fast street car/bike benefits from uprated suspension and improved braking, yet alone shedding unnecessary weight, start adding power and the compromises start becoming highlighted. But very often its the nitrous that gets blamed

Steve

X 2